Paleontology

Dinosaur Biological Material

The existence of DNA, Proteins, or Amino Acids that make up endogenous biological material from ancient life reveals that the catastrophic event that killed off the large animals was recent. Nowhere near even 100,000,000 years.

The half-life of DNA is 521yrs. The half-life of Carbon-14 (C14) is 5,730 yrs.

The presence of endogenous biological material and/or Carbon-14 inside non-fossilized bones is evidence that Dinosaurs were recently extinct and the claim of millions of years is fully debunked and exposed as a hoax. The magic of evolution (time) seriously reduced. Mutation and Natural Selection are painfully slow at change, so time, a great deal of time is necessary to make the fairy tale seem plausible. And if all the combinatorial factors could ever be estimated for the conditions of life you can understand why those that would deny a more recent catastrophe and passionately seek out Multi-Verses and Heisenberg's uncertainty.

Information

Information Enigma

The existence of symbols or a set of symbols commonly described as a code or scheme is direct evidence against non-directed processes as the origin of life.

The mere fact that codes can be arbitrary or that they could be anything is also the same evidence that it must only be one thing. In other words arbitrary codes such as ASCII where the decimal value for the upper case "A" is 65 and the "Tab" key is set as 9. Setting these values as "controls" prior to defining numerals and alpha characters. Bob Bemer could have used different values, however, since he could have chosen anything, it is in the actual selection (freely chosen), the specific symbolic transformations and most importantly the external agreement (not bound by the code) that causes the code to be an effective form of information transmission.

ASCII and DNA are both symbolic schemes.

Schemes require a schemer.

Symbolic linking of a physical resource to a non-physical characteristic is unique to intelligence.

Binary data like a bit or byte does not "know" that its set of on/off's code for the number "0" (48). The bit doesn't know it is part of a byte and a byte doesn't know it is used as a code. Not only is this arbitrary but it is also neutral. The bit doesn't form the other bits into a byte. No single bit can flip another bit because of physical characteristics. The byte has no power to alter any other bit or byte without programmatic specification, such as epigenetics.

Adenine, Guanine, Thymine and Cytosine can be coded in binary as a two-bit byte. The triple nucleotide base codes for a single amino acid and linear strings of single amino acids combine to fold into shapes that comprise the molecular machines. The sugar phosphate backbone is neutral and does not favor specific amino acids (base preferences). The arbitrary condition and neutrality of binary data is exactly the same for DNA. Nucleotides do not know that they are part of a nucleotide triplet and do not alter their neighboring codons based on physicality. The triplet doesn't know it is part of "codifying" an amino acid codon such as the combination of Adenine, Adenine, and one more Adenine, coding for the Lysine Amino Acid.

The point that is being offered is that for any system that is 100% arbitrary (could be anything) and also neutral (no physical constraint that determines significance/non-material) then "intelligence or design" is required for the arbitrary system which obviously is not arbitrary, and from a coding perspective it is critical that data assets are abstracted from the physicality where physical forces could alter the desired specified complexity.

 

Magnetism can alter binary data and radiation can alter biological data. Fortunately error checking algorithms protect data integrity.

Binary data and biological data share many common traits. They are both arbitrary and neutral (and do error checking). They also share common origin. The only known source of origin for coded information is "intelligence". Only an agent can use a physical resource to code for a non-physical entity. Commonly called an "oracle" within evolutionary informatics. The oracle in "all" cases is the programmer.

Evolutionary biology never offers a reason for believing that an arbitrary and neutral based coding system could form out of material processes. And formal sciences like ProtoBioCybernetics is significant evidence of "intelligent design". Naturalistic sciences typically ignore or simply label information science as "pseudo-science". Formalism versus constrained physicality can be mapped categoricaly within a data classification framework. This system quickly culls information sets into two classes."(Free Agent) Choice versus (Physical) Determinism".

I suspect all computer programs used to illustrate "evolutionary biology" like AVIDA demonstrate "intelligent design" more than they demonstrate the likelihood of "pre-existent" entities mutating and "naturally" selecting into more complex ones.

 

Information is not physical. Another obvious proof of the similarity is that we use computer systems to model DNA and stored binary data directly into DNA.

The ENCODE project which has substantially negated the claim that large portions of the nucleotide chains are junk. Junk DNA is not nor has it ever been junk. The genome has been wrecked, but the design of non-coding areas for control is part of the stable formalism.

And if you are interested in o'l time Darwinism there is always vestigial organs.

 

Atheism can be cured. Consider the Information...